Professional Standards
Pincites supports legal teams with:- Role-based access, audit logs, and Microsoft 365 SSO
- Full human-in-the-loop review. AI suggestions are never applied automatically
- Clear source attribution for every suggestion, eliminating black-box behavior
- Secure cloud infrastructure with US-based data residency
Attorney-Client Privilege
We preserve privilege through:- No automated decisions: every suggestion is reviewed and accepted/rejected by a person
- Zero data retention by model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic)
- Data encryption in transit and at rest
- Logical separation of customer data per client/matter
Bar Association Guidelines
We align with major legal tech guidelines:- California Bar: Transparent AI usage, no autonomous decisions, and human oversight
- ABA Opinion 512: Competence, confidentiality, supervision, and disclosure
- EU AI Act: Pincites maintains human-in-the-loop design
- Onboarding and training pursuant to Article 4 of the EU AI Act (training & understanding of AI tools)
Usage Requirements & Court Disclosure
AI outputs are suggestions, not legal advice. You remain in control.- Review all outputs before relying on them
- Follow local court disclosure requirements
- Document AI usage if required by judge or jurisdiction
Best Practices
We recommend:- Regular review of your internal AI policy
- Oversight workflows for every redline
- Logging acceptance/rejection of suggestions
- Transparent disclosure in filings or negotiations when appropriate
Data Jurisdiction
- All Pincites data is hosted in the United States (GCP)
- No international data transfers
- US data laws and privacy protections apply
- Redundant infrastructure supports business continuity
Transparency & Ethical Guardrails
- AI suggestions are benchmarked and tested against real contract data
- System flags hallucinations, reasoning errors, and prompt injection attempts
- Feedback loops let you control how your playbooks evolve
- Vendors are contractually bound to strict security standards